This graphics chip is designed with PCI-E in mind and is "backported" to work with the AGP bus.
Ati radeon hd 2600 xt compatibility driver#
Especially if the source of this problem is the same: some missing descriptions in the binary, closed driver that prevent correct device detection. But in Linux I begin to feel that this is hopeless.
Ati radeon hd 2600 xt compatibility install#
Using the above procedure I was able to install the 7.12 drivers in Windows XP for this problematic HD2600Pro AGP card. When I re-checked the differences in *.INF files I've found it became obvious that the Sapphire released the drivers that include support for "9587 device", but the original ATI Catalyst drivers DO NOT. In both files, under the "" section, add the following at the end of the second line, which starts "R6=DriverPath_R6":įor example, your entry could look as follows:
For example, your entry could look as follows:Ĭ:\ATI\SUPPORT\\Driver\Driver\XP_INF\CX_*****.infĬ:\ATI\SUPPORT\\Driver\Driver\CX_*****.INIĬ:\ATI\SUPPORT\\Driver\Driver\INSTALL.INI The lines can be placed anywhere under the "" section. You can do a search for "HD 2400" to put the lines with the other entries for the HD2000 series, if you wish. Edit the files as follows, and you can then run C:\ATI\SUPPORT\\Driver\setup.exe.Ĭ:\ATI\SUPPORT\\Driver\Packages\Drivers\Display\LH_INF\CX_*****.i nf At the next opportunity, cancel the installation and navigate to the C:\ATI\SUPPORT\ folder in Windows Explorer. Run the installer, and continue until you extract the driver into a folder under C:\ATI\SUPPORT\. Sometimes the drivers don't get updated for every card for every driver release, so you need to edit a couple files to add your card. If your AGP card is not supported by the latest ATI drivers. Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Note the "Unknown device 9587" - and I've just updated the PCI ID database by using "update-pciids" command! Memory at fbf00000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Įxpansion ROM at fbe00000 Ĭapabilities: Power Management version 3Ĭontrol: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B. Memory at e0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 0028įlags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11 But hey, drivers from supplied CD worked! I did a simple "diff -u" on the *.INF files from the different drivers releases and it occured to me that in every ATI driver some generic information was missing.Ġ1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 9587Ġ1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 9587 (prog-if 00 ) The installer simply stated that it was unable to detect the hardware. My suspicions started to rise when the downloaded from AMD/ATI site display drivers refused to install in Windows XP (I've tried 7.12, 7.11 and 7.10). I've checked my nf many times and having a 5+ years of experience with various distros (including Gentoo for example, where you have to basically write nf or you have no X at all) I must say that the nf is rather fine.
The Xorg.0.log shows no signs of errors (EE), serious warnings (WW) and the like. Let me explain.Īfter installing Catalyst 7.12 drivers in Ubuntu 7.10 the X.org is unable to turn on the high resolution mode on my LCD (1680x1050 Samsung SyncMaster 2232), and only the failsafe X kicks in. I was able to install the Windows XP drivers - although only the ones provided on CD worked. Recently I've installed a Sapphire HD2600Pro AGP card instead of my beloved nVidia 7600GS (I needed to help my family where another video card broke).
0 kommentar(er)
